Hi Dave, Brian,
Regarding one point regarding the WG status pages on the tools servers:
on 2006-12-19 15:51 Dave Crocker said the following:
[...]
3. Remove the documents list from the WG charter page, since it is
redundant with the Status page and less complete.
However, it contains different information - it "knows" which drafts are
official WG drafts, and it includes "obsoleted by/ updated by" information
for RFCs.
Good point. Then I suggest that the Tools folks upgrade the Status page to
include those features.
Right. The tools pages also knows about which drafts are official WG drafts.
Non-Wg drafts are listed in a separate section at the bottom. It is however
not plainly stated that one group is WG drafts and the other isn't; I'll fix
that.
Regarding the obsoleted/updated-by annotation for the RFCs, that's a very
good point. I'll add that information.
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf