Brian E Carpenter wrote:
In other words, Brian, by running the experiment, in its current form,
you are
ensuring that meaningful changes can't be made without disruption.
I truly don't get your concern. We have mechanisms today to get
operational material onto the IETF web site. We won't be siwtching
those mechanisms off while running the ION experiment. If, which
Then I can't figure out what goes into the 'experiment' and what doesn't. It
sounds as if this becomes redundant -- ie, extra -- effort. That reduces the
incentive to use it.
I doubt, we decide IONs aren't a success, we will simply post the
ION material to the web site in the current way. If they are a success,
we'll consolidate the ION mechanism in the light of experience.
I don't see disruption either way.
"consolidate" does not mean making changes, or "changes" doesn't mean
disruption?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf