ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The Devil's in the Deployment RE: NATs as firewalls

2007-03-09 20:07:19
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


      We have IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses.

Doesn't this presume that if people used these locally assigned
addresses they would then NAT to a public address space?

I think the main thing folks might miss is that a lot of people really
want all of this on a single address--while having multiple addresses
concurrent on a single machine is acceptable for larger machines,
specifically servers, having multiples on a single host as a general
rule hasn't met with much in the way of acceptability for the vast
majority of hosts.

At least that's what I'm hearing.

:-)

Russ


- --
riw(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com CCIE <>< Grace Alone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF7CNVER27sUhU9OQRAqf0AKCZuM30XPZO5SUYkFKpuueq3q/MIQCg/5k1
TeUcUHxrrjd755ovY1cG1/E=
=i0+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf