-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We have IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses.
Doesn't this presume that if people used these locally assigned
addresses they would then NAT to a public address space?
I think the main thing folks might miss is that a lot of people really
want all of this on a single address--while having multiple addresses
concurrent on a single machine is acceptable for larger machines,
specifically servers, having multiples on a single host as a general
rule hasn't met with much in the way of acceptability for the vast
majority of hosts.
At least that's what I'm hearing.
:-)
Russ
- --
riw(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF7CNVER27sUhU9OQRAqf0AKCZuM30XPZO5SUYkFKpuueq3q/MIQCg/5k1
TeUcUHxrrjd755ovY1cG1/E=
=i0+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf