Does DHCP require a change to the residential CPE James? How long is it
going to take to change every residential router in the world? Do you
think it is an unreasonable requirement to not have to do this?
You can't just object to HELD on the basis that you think it's been
misrepresented. I don't accept that it has - but in any case, it's not a
technical rationale.
Cheers,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, 20 April 2007 7:31 AM
To: Dawson, Martin; John Schnizlein; Andrew Newton
Cc: GEOPRIV WG; Allison Mankin; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group
Hums
At 04:20 PM 4/19/2007, Dawson, Martin wrote:
"DHCP is not adequate because it doesn't meet multiple sets of
requirements as documented multiple times ..."
bologna
"documented multiple times" means in individual submissions
of which, zero facts were presented to substantiate
If DHCP were so inadequate, why is the DSL forum now going to specify
it? Why does PacketCable define it? These were fairly recent moves...
And, how many times has HELD been presented as if it were a product
of an IETF WG?
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf