On 9/13/07, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun(_at_)itojun(_dot_)org> wrote:
http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/ula-global.txt has my thoughts on this, which
i've appropriated without permission from hinden, huston, and narten
and inaccurately failed to remove their names from (since none of them
supports the proposal). in fact, nobody in the ietf intelligensia
supports the proposal. the showstopped is that this appears to many as
an end-run around PI, and the fear is that there's no way to prevent it
because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to
IPv6-to-IPv6
NAT.
did you read the thread some months ago? There was mention ID and LOC splitting.
ULA fits that idea almost perfect.
--
Roger Jorgensen |
rogerj(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no | roger(_at_)jorgensen(_dot_)no
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf