IETF Discussion (date)
September 30, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Danny McPherson, 21:56
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 19:05
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker, 18:26
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Bernard Aboba, 08:27
- Seeking ICANN Nomcom 2008 candidate, Olaf M. Kolkman, 07:30
September 28, 2007
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 18:19
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 14:39
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joe Abley, 14:20
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eric Rescorla, 14:20
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Ned Freed, 09:43
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 09:26
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joe Abley, 09:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 08:43
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, John C Klensin, 08:20
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joao Damas, 04:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Jaap Akkerhuis, 03:36
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, SM, 02:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 00:34
September 27, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:18
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, John C Klensin, 19:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 19:08
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 17:26
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 17:10
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 12:59
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Keith Moore, 09:54
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:55
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Spencer Dawkins, 06:11
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 05:00
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 03:07
September 26, 2007
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 18:51
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Marc Manthey, 16:09
- Re: Hello IETF!, Marc Manthey, 13:24
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:24
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Scott Brim, 12:06
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brad Hards, 12:06
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Tim Polk, 11:43
- RE: CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:44
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Hoffman, 08:43
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, IETF member Dave Aronson, 08:43
- Re: CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, Joel Jaeggli, 08:38
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Virendra Gandhi, 08:13
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Steven M. Bellovin, 07:02
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:23
- CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, IETF member Dave Aronson, 06:23
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Harald Alvestrand, 05:26
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 04:20
- RE: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, michael.dillon, 03:55
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 03:15
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 02:43
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 02:43
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Simon Josefsson, 01:22
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Bill McQuillan, 00:33
September 25, 2007
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Lawrence Rosen, 23:59
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 18:18
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 17:59
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 16:55
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 16:28
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 16:06
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 15:31
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Stewart Bryant, 15:24
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 15:24
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 15:24
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 13:39
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 13:20
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Suresh Krishnan, 12:54
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Simon Josefsson, 12:54
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Florian Weimer, 12:54
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 12:38
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Daniel Senie, 12:38
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Scott Brim, 12:30
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:21
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Daniel Senie, 12:19
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 12:08
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this?, Bernard Aboba, 12:08
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Stephan Wenger, 12:03
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 11:51
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Chris Elliott, 11:41
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Florian Weimer, 11:32
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 11:32
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 11:19
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Clint Chaplin, 11:19
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Chris Elliott, 11:13
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Ted Hardie, 11:13
- why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 10:59
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 09:54
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John Levine, 09:52
- IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 09:12
- RE: draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 09:02
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Edward Lewis, 08:25
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 07:19
- Re: secid review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, Sam Hartman, 07:11
- draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 04:38
September 24, 2007
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Kessens, 18:22
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 17:25
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Mark Andrews, 16:56
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:56
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 15:47
- secid review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, David Harrington, 14:34
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Stephen Hanna, 13:09
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 07:17
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Conrad, 06:53
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:31
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:31
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 04:06
- Re: Renumbering, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:04
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Olaf M. Kolkman, 01:00
September 23, 2007
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 19:36
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 17:39
- RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Greene, 13:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 04:43
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 03:31
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Jari Arkko, 03:17
September 22, 2007
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Greg Skinner, 20:36
- Re: Spam solution?, Dave Crocker, 17:17
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:24
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Eliot Lear, 05:45
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Peter Dambier, 02:23
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 01:28
September 21, 2007
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 15:39
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 14:07
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 13:51
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 13:51
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Russ Housley, 13:04
- Re: ideas getting shot down, John C Klensin, 12:47
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 11:49
- Re: Vendor viewpoint on ULA filtered-by-default, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:32
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 11:20
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 10:48
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Russ Housley, 10:26
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:26
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Dave Crocker, 10:26
- ideas getting shot down, ULA-C, etc. -- please move to the right list, Jari Arkko, 09:39
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF, Paul Hoffman, 09:18
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 09:15
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Sam Hartman, 09:15
- Vendor viewpoint on ULA filtered-by-default, Fred Baker, 09:02
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 08:56
- RE: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:45
- RE: ideas getting shot down, michael.dillon, 08:45
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 08:36
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Stephen Sprunk, 08:23
- Re: Spam solution?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:32
- Re: Spam solution?, Dave Aronson, 04:44
- Re: Spam solution?, admin, 04:24
- Spam solution?, admin, 03:46
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Patrick Vande Walle, 03:46
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:09
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:09
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, Elwyn Davies, 01:29
September 20, 2007
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 23:10
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 22:49
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Bernard Aboba, 22:49
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:06
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Greg Skinner, 21:35
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephen Sprunk, 20:30
- Re: I18n of email addresses (Was: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 14:48
- Re: I18n of email addresses, Paul Hoffman, 14:06
- I18n of email addresses (Was: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:25
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Michael Richardson, 13:02
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 12:54
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 12:54
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 12:31
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Michael Richardson, 12:31
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 12:16
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephen Sprunk, 11:59
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault, 11:45
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 11:16
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:33
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 10:33
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Hoffman, 10:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 10:20
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), David Conrad, 10:20
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Marc Manthey, 10:07
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:01
- Sorry double post: Representation of end-users at the IETF, Peter Dambier, 10:01
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 09:39
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 09:39
- RE: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), michael.dillon, 08:22
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 08:01
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Fred Baker, 08:01
- RE: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Christian Huitema, 07:43
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Patrick Vande Walle, 07:37
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 07:11
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 06:58
- RE: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), michael.dillon, 06:41
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 06:30
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:15
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 06:06
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:06
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 06:00
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 05:51
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 05:46
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:45
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:45
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 05:45
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 05:45
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:45
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:45
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:45
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 03:18
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Fred Baker, 01:44
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 01:39
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 01:39
September 19, 2007
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 21:41
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 21:22
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Lynnold M Wini, 17:56
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 17:41
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Ole Jacobsen, 17:18
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 17:14
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 16:41
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Kessens, 16:08
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Hoffman, 15:52
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 15:44
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 13:59
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 13:45
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall], Stephen Sprunk, 13:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 13:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 13:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 13:23
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Stephen Sprunk, 13:23
- Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:23
- RE: [Tsvwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib (MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 12:54
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Tony Hain, 12:24
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 11:05
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Eliot Lear, 11:00
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 10:36
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 10:25
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Michael Thomas, 10:24
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Eliot Lear, 10:24
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 09:59
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:49
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 09:15
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 09:15
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 09:15
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 09:15
- Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Olaf M. Kolkman, 09:03
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, john heasley, 09:03
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 08:44
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Paul Vixie, 08:44
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 08:44
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 08:44
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 06:55
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 06:28
- Re: security review of draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt, Brian Haley, 05:59
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 05:59
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 05:59
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 05:59
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 00:53
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 00:53
September 18, 2007
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 23:22
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Paul Vixie, 22:57
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 22:35
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 22:07
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 22:00
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 22:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 22:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 22:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 22:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 22:00
- Re: ideas getting shot down (was: mini-cores), Paul Vixie, 20:59
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 20:49
- ideas getting shot down (was: mini-cores), Keith Moore, 20:07
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 19:24
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 19:04
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 18:11
- mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 15:18
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 14:52
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault, 12:32
- XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 11:21
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jeroen Massar, 11:13
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:05
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:05
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Paul Vixie, 10:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:57
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Lixia Zhang, 10:50
- Re: security review of draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt, Jari Arkko, 10:49
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 09:57
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Ted Hardie, 09:30
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jeroen Massar, 09:05
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Tony Hain, 08:17
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Tony Hain, 08:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Peter Koch, 07:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 06:42
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Felipe Rodrigues, 05:19
- RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Greene, 05:19
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 00:52
September 17, 2007
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day, 07:49
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 07:09
- RE: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", michael.dillon, 06:33
- RE: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association thatspans transports?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:29
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Scott Brim, 05:43
- Re: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", RJ Atkinson, 05:43
- RE: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, Atle Monrad, 05:27
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day, 04:16
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Michael Tuexen, 03:57
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 03:12
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Fred Baker, 02:14
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 02:04
September 16, 2007
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jari Arkko, 21:13
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Lixia Zhang, 19:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 17:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 11:07
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Frank Ellermann, 09:28
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07:22
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 06:47
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 04:48
September 15, 2007
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Hex Star, 22:37
- RE: Renumbering, Michel Py, 21:34
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 21:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 19:19
- Re: Hello IETF!, Marc Manthey, 18:40
- Re: Hello IETF!, Joe Baptista, 17:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 15:34
- Hello IETF!, bidu.pub, 12:23
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:20
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Terry Gray, 09:44
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Hoffman, 08:18
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:10
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Hoffman, 07:53
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 07:09
- T-shirt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 01:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 00:55
September 14, 2007
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 19:07
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, David Conrad, 17:08
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 16:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 15:54
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Noel Chiappa, 15:02
- Firewall timeouts, David Morris, 14:56
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Florian Weimer, 14:37
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Greg Skinner, 13:36
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 12:45
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 11:56
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 11:34
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 11:32
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 11:16
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 11:00
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Keith Moore, 10:58
- Re: Renumbering, Tony Finch, 10:46
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 10:40
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 08:14
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 07:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Spencer Dawkins, 07:26
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 06:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 06:51
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Thomas Narten, 06:39
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Marshall Eubanks, 06:09
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:02
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Thomas Narten, 05:54
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 05:48
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 05:48
- Subscribtion and qustion, Natasha Petrovska, 05:48
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 05:48
- Best Practices in IP addresses Management to Ease Renumbering (Was: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:21
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 05:14
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Florian Weimer, 05:04
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 04:49
- Re: Renumbering, Fred Baker, 04:32
- RE: Renumbering, michael.dillon, 03:19
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 02:38
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Bill Manning, 02:17
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:39
September 13, 2007
- Re: Renumbering, Greg Skinner, 22:09
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:54
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 21:33
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Mark Andrews, 21:08
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 21:03
- RE: Renumbering, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:37
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 20:37
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Mark Andrews, 19:29
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Fred Baker, 19:20
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 19:04
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 18:49
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 18:49
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Fred Baker, 18:02
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Noel Chiappa, 17:52
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 17:46
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Tony Hain, 17:31
- Re: renumbering, was Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 16:53
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Bill Manning, 16:25
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 16:16
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 15:53
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Karl Auerbach, 15:36
- Re: Renumbering, Fred Baker, 15:25
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 15:24
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:03
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Li, 14:53
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 14:44
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:35
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:24
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Keith Moore, 14:20
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Karl Auerbach, 14:02
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 13:17
- Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Jari Arkko, 13:06
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 12:32
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 12:01
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 11:54
- Re: Renumbering, Tony Finch, 11:45
- Re: renumbering, was Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Finch, 11:38
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 11:08
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 10:53
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 10:41
- Re: Renumbering, Spencer Dawkins, 10:27
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 10:20
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 10:13
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:04
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 09:10
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 09:05
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 08:42
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 08:32
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 08:28
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Fleischman, Eric, 08:24
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, michael.dillon, 08:14
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 08:01
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 07:50
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 07:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 07:24
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 07:16
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 07:08
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 06:51
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 06:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 05:57
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 05:36
- Re: Renumbering, Jeff McAdams, 05:35
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 05:35
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:28
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Arnaud Ebalard, 05:11
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Arnaud Ebalard, 05:11
- Renumbering, Dave Cridland, 05:10
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 05:02
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 04:51
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 04:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 04:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 04:40
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 04:40
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 04:40
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Ralph Droms, 04:29
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, michael.dillon, 04:20
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 04:20
- ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jari Arkko, 03:17
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 02:41
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tim Chown, 02:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 02:29
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 02:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 01:26
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 01:12
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 00:29
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 00:05
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michel Py, 00:02
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 00:01
September 12, 2007
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 23:56
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Roger Jørgensen, 23:53
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michel Py, 23:45
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 23:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 22:58
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 21:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 20:58
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, David Conrad, 19:46
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 18:57
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 18:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 17:55
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 11:18
- Proposal for Handling RFC Errata, Danny McPherson, 11:11
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Roger Jørgensen, 11:09
- Re: mandatory draft sections (was Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Tony Hansen, 10:37
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 10:14
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, ietf-discuss, 10:08
- Its an IRTF issue at this point RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:01
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:52
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 08:40
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 08:37
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 08:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 08:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Sam Weiler, 08:29
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 08:27
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 08:26
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 08:25
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 08:15
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 08:11
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 08:09
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 07:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:46
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 07:44
- IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 07:35
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 07:34
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 07:25
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 07:22
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 07:03
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 07:00
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Thomas Narten, 06:13
- RE: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Debbie Garside, 05:47
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 05:47
- Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Nicolas Williams, 05:47
- New to IETF [Was: Next step on web phishing draft], Willie Gillespie, 05:47
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Jari Arkko, 05:31
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:22
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Michael Thomas, 05:06
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 04:51
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Dan Schutzer, 02:28
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 01:01
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hannes Tschofenig, 01:01
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Christian Huitema, 00:53
September 11, 2007
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:55
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Bernard Aboba, 16:26
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Jeff . Hodges, 15:49
- Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Ned Freed, 15:17
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 14:40
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Ned Freed, 14:36
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 14:08
- Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 14:06
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 13:56
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, David Morris, 13:56
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Sam Hartman, 13:34
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 13:12
- Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Shumon Huque, 12:40
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Shumon Huque, 12:35
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 12:31
- RE: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:42
- Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), der Mouse, 08:41
- Re[2]: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Chris Drake, 08:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation wi, Bernard Aboba, 08:41
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Debbie Garside, 08:41
- Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), tom.petch, 08:41
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Paul Leach, 08:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Bernard Aboba, 07:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Sam Hartman, 05:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0 (Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6) to Proposed Standard, Jari Arkko, 00:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko, 00:32
September 10, 2007
- tools.ietf.org SSL certificate (Was: Nomcom 2007-8: Nominations Deadline Extended to Sep 17, 2007), SM, 23:22
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Keith Moore, 22:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko, 21:49
- Re: Document file names, Spencer Dawkins, 20:07
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Bernard Aboba, 18:09
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Sam Hartman, 17:06
- OT: Document file names, Paul Hoffman, 16:42
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), michael.dillon, 15:53
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), michael.dillon, 15:46
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Bernard Aboba, 15:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Keith Moore, 14:54
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 14:52
- Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:54
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 13:00
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 12:59
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Larry Masinter, 12:58
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 12:44
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 12:39
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Dave Cridland, 12:28
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 12:27
- Away on vacation [Re: Posting of draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base-01.txt ], Henrik Levkowetz, 12:17
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 11:54
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 11:53
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Jeffrey Altman, 11:45
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 11:35
- draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 10:36
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 10:23
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Dan Schutzer, 07:26
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 07:10
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:25
- RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Glen Zorn, 05:33
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Simon Leinen, 05:32
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 03:29
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 03:17
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eliot Lear, 00:01
September 09, 2007
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Bernard Aboba, 23:17
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:52
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Bill Manning, 16:51
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:22
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Marshall Eubanks, 15:53
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:42
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 11:30
September 07, 2007
- RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Darryl \(Dassa\) Lynch, 16:18
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Bob Braden, 11:29
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Marshall Eubanks, 10:01
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Simon Josefsson, 07:46
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, James Carlson, 06:57
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Andy Bierman, 06:52
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:06
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Adrian Farrel, 05:37
- RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Eric Gray (LO/EUS), 05:24
- RE: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 05:07
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 05:07
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 05:07
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Lars Eggert, 04:52
- joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, YAO, 04:05
- ISOC Fellowship to the IETF - seeking applicants for IETF 70 and IETF 71, Mirjam Kuehne, 01:47
September 06, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 12:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 11:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:51
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Paul Aitken, 05:56
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Lars Eggert, 05:56
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Paul Aitken, 05:56
- Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 05:56
- RE: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 05:56
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard, Julian Chesterfield, 05:56
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard, Julian Chesterfield, 05:56
- Re: (no subject), Dave Aronson, 03:34
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Lars Eggert, 02:40
- (no subject), rawad Melhem, 00:22
September 03, 2007
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard, Wijnen, Bert \(Bert\), 13:05
- Re: What to do next?, Stefanos Harhalakis, 10:33
- Re: What to do next?, Spencer Dawkins, 03:33
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard, Wijnen, Bert \(Bert\), 01:44