Bernard Aboba wrote:
Bernard,
I quickly looked through your draft. I don't think it applies for a case when
there is no intention to form a WG. Is my understanding correct?
Section 2 says:
"The Charter for a Study Group SHOULD include at least the following
milestones:
o Development of a Working Group Charter.
o Development of a document demonstrating fulfillment of
the Working Group formation criteria described in
[RFC2418] Section 2.1."
So the expectation is that Study Groups will focus on enabling WG
formation. Are you imagining other scenarios in which a SG might be
useful?
I am looking for a lightweight process that doesn't introduce as much
delay as a typical WG does. In particular I am interested in something
that might work for reviewing and building consensus around a well
defined piece of work (typically a document). One use case I have is a
document that is not a product of a WG, but which defines a framework
shared by two existing working groups.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf