ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)

2007-09-14 11:34:48
Bill,

On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:15 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:29:39PM -0700, Tony Hain wrote:
IPv6 _is_ IPv4 with more bits and it is being deployed that way.
beating this dead horse...

The official IETF state sport.

actually, David is profoundly wrong.

Frequently.

IPv6 is an entirely new address family - it has erie similarities to IPv4, but is not backward compatable.

The "with more bits" part wasn't an offhand comment.

Regards,
-drc


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf