{A few short comments rolled into one...}
> From: Tony Li <tli(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
> As a practical matter, these things are quite doable.
Tony, my sense is that the hard part is not places *within one's own
organization* where one's addresses are stored, but rather in *other
organizations*; e.g. entries in *their* firewalls. Can those with
experience confirm/deny this?
> From: Jeff McAdams <jeffm(_at_)iglou(_dot_)com>
> the sentiments against PI space in IPv6 are very ISP-centric
If the system routing (which is not, after all, the property of any one
organization) collapses, it's not just the ISP's who will suffer.
> From: Marshall Eubanks <tme(_at_)multicasttech(_dot_)com>
> the routing tables do not care if you have PI or PA space, just
> whether it is announced or not. If you are already announcing PA
> space, and getting into the DFZ, it does not harm the tables if you
> change to PI space.
Yes, but the whole point of PA space is that generally organizations using
them *don't* each have a separate entry in the DFZ; with PI space, *every*
organization *does*.
> From: arno(_at_)natisbad(_dot_)org (Arnaud Ebalard)
> let's just stop using the 3 letters word. It does not exist anymore.
Yes, those shelves upon shelves of 3-letter boxes at all my local
electronics stores don't exist. And all the millions of them deployed in
the network don't exist either. Speaking of "living in that dream
world".... :-)
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf