At 04:24 AM 10/30/2007, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I admit now
s/now/not
all PSs have IPR attached, but this is almost certainly
> intended to kill any IPR from achieving DS. Is that what is intended
> here?
I don't believe that was the intention, but that's a question for Brian.
I disagree that all PSs are patented (if that is what you meant).
see above - I misspelled a word that means something else. sorry
I've
implemented several such standards without worrying about patents. I
believe the majority of PSs are actually published without known
patents. A search in the IETF IPR tracker should answer that.
/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf