-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
you might look at tcpm.
You might find RFC 872 interesting reading:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0872.txt
0872 TCP-on-a-LAN. M.A. Padlipsky. September 1982.
People have been saying that TCP was the wrong answer for something
or another for a long time. We have had to tweak the algorithms from
time to time, and people continue to hunt for the best and most
scalable algorithm. The discussions happen across our high speed (2.5
and 10 G in many places) backbone, and use SMTP, which runs on TCP,
and the only real alternative for elastic traffic that has been
proposed (SCTP) uses the same algorithms.
Draw your own conclusions.
On Dec 15, 2007, at 2:17 AM, Jeyasekar Antony wrote:
hi
I heard that TCP is not suitable for high speed network because of
its instability, lattency.
is it true? is there any research work going on in this context?
jeyasekar
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFHZFixbjEdbHIsm0MRAlZXAJ9o4Yqh64Wu56PdJZ2f0d+haGS5fQCfcjvu
+eE/UDHv1tpso9X3pA6/2Gs=
=jvAx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf