-----Original Message-----
From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com]
The first of the two comments below is probably
primarily the IESG's concern, although it affects the IETF last call.
The second comment is a more general issue.
Comments:
This document requests assignment of a Diameter Command Code.
As this requires "IETF Consensus" additional care may
be needed to ensure that the Last Call produces clarity on
the required consensus.
It would seem appropriate for the last call announcement to
have indicated this requirement. It is difficult to claim
"IETF Consensus"
from the typical non-response to IETF last call for
informational documents.
Hi Joel,
Thank you for catching this. I have required the Secretariat to re-issue
the Last Call with the clarification of the issue you are pointing to.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf