On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
In essence, something like this would increase the address lenght by
16 bits.
Well, as I am sure you know, the reason NAT is so successful is that
it
basically does extend the IP address space by 16 bits, but in a
backwards compatible way, making it incrementally deployable. Thus,
you
get high utility and ease of deployment, the double whammy that
leads to
success, as draft-iab-protocol-success discusses.
So this thread could be summarized as "32+16 > 128"
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf