[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

2008-03-26 06:47:31
Keith Moore wrote:
IPv4-only hosts can see the AAAA record even if they can't 
directly send mail to that address.  and there's no reason
("obvious" or otherwise) why a MTA should reject mail from
a host just because that MTA can't directly route to it

What I wrote was "at their border", that is not any MTA on a
route from sender to receiver.  "At their border" is the hop
where receivers decide if they accept the mail, or reject it.

If they accept it, and later find they can't deliver it, and
it is not a case for /dev/null, they MUST report the problem:

| it MUST construct an "undeliverable mail" notification
| message and send it to the originator of the undeliverable
| mail (as indicated by the reverse-path).

For IPv4-only back to IPv6-only that cannot work, therefore
the IPv4-only border MTA is obliged to reject mails with an
IPv6-only envelope sender address.

there's nothing that requires a user to use the same MTA
for outbound mail that is used to receive inbound mail.

My definition of IPv4-only is that there is no other route.

The IPv4 border MTA needs to know if that is the case or not
for its decision to accept or reject IPv6-only envelope
sender addresses, because if all else fails it MUST [s.a.].
granted, lots of really really stupid things are done in 
the name of spam filtering that make no more sense than
this, but they're not "obvious" - they're just stupid

The duty to send DSNs is not about "spam filtering", it is
about the reliability of SMTP.  Dropping all undeliverable
IPv6-only reverse-path mails in an IPv4-only MRN can affect
90% spam, but where it affects the remaining good mails it
would be bad.

of course, as a practical matter, any domain for which
mail eventually ends up in an IPv6-only world is going
to need to have at least one MX pointing to a IPv4-capable
host, until IPv6 becomes ubiquitous or very nearly so.

so the example above only makes sense in a world where
IPv6 is ubiquitous

Bill did not say that it is a hypothetical example for the
times when IPv6 is ubiquitous, I took it for a real example
today.  As a practical matter, I have no idea which of my 
providers if any is able to reach an IPv6-only


IETF mailing list