The "atompub" was originally in reference to the Atompub Working Group.
Now that the WG is closed, it probably would make sense to change this
to just atom. If another version of the draft is needed based on
last-call comments, I can make the name change then.
- James
Tim Bray wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM, The IESG
<iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Atom Bidirectional Attribute '
<draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt> as an Experimental RFC
The name of this draft is a little misleading. Shouldn't it be
"atom-bidi" not "atompub-bidi"? It doesn't have anything to do with
the protocol, which is what atompub stands for in most people's minds.
-Tim
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf