David -
Many thanks for the review.
- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt
Reviewer: David L. Black
Review Date: 19 May 2008
IESG Telechat date: 22 May 2008
Summary:
This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
This is a well-written detailed draft updating an existing
RFC on rate-based congestion control. It has clearly had a
high level of review by congestion control experts.
I have only done a generalist review, and in particular have
not checked the equations and pseudo-code in detail. I trust
that the authors and reviewers in the DCCP WG to have done
this level of review, as indicated by the change history.
idnits 2.08.10 found 1 line that was 1 character too long
and pointed out that a -04 version of the rfc2581bis draft
exists. Neither of these need attention, as the RFC Editor
will handle them in the normal course of editing activity.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf