Uh, Folks
DOMAIN NAMES cannot be reserved in that manner and this lawsuit from the US
District Court says so.
http://www.domainnamenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/express-media-express-corp-nd-ca.pdf
That's not going to fly. DOMAIN NAMES are IP and need to be registered as
TM's to protect them. If you want these domains to be protected and reserved
then register them and pay the filing and maintenance fees on them.
Todd Glassey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Elz" <kre(_at_)munnari(_dot_)OZ(_dot_)AU>
To: <debbie(_at_)ictmarketing(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
Cc: <iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on
draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:50:02 +0100
From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie(_at_)ictmarketing(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
Message-ID: <049b01c8d089$6c901ce0$0a00a8c0(_at_)CPQ86763045110>
| I would also add that to go against an IETF BCP
Huh? The BCP in question says (in a bit more eloquent form)
"Here are some domain names that are reserved from all normal use,
and so are suitable for use in places where something with the
syntax of a valid domain names is required, but no real domain
name should be used - use them where applicable".
It does not say "you must use these domain names" (for any purpose
at all).
Where's the "go against an IETF BCP" here?
kre
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf