Robert Elz wrote:
The issue is why the IESG is ignoring the demonstrated
will of the IETF.
Figuring out what the "demonstrated will of the IETF" is
is the job of the IESG, and in the case of an individual
submission such as 2821bis it can be rather tricky.
Somebody *deciding* that using foo.com in 2821bis is "the
demonstrated will of the IETF" needs to be a Chair or the
IESG, and I'd consider to appeal the decision.
Frank
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf