Lisa Dusseault wrote:
given those caveats and the lack of an official IESG or IETF
position on this
Dunno about the IESG, but I thought the IETF position is what
BCP 115 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-2.1> says:
"2.1 Demonstratable, New, Long-Lived Utility" [...] "New URI
schemes SHOULD have clear utility to the broad Internet
community, beyond that available with already registered
URI schemes."
Possibly held: and helds: (or is it heldref: and heldrefs: ?)
are as they should be, but I didn't see this, and that's why
I asked.
Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf