ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08

2008-08-07 10:23:41
Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
Before that failure, there's the problem that a GET to a HELD server requires
a custom body.

RFC 2616 says "A message-body MUST NOT be included in a request if the
specification of the request method does not allow sending an entity-body
in requests." So I think including a body in a GET request is not allowed.

That's why we have the HTTPbis WG :-)

"Bodies on GET (and other) requests" -- <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/19>

Resolution:

--- snip ---
Consensus to, in RFC2616 section 4.3:

* Change "does not allow" to "explicitly disallows", as per http://www.w3.org/mid/64972E13-483B-4F69-94FD-F2EE516286A8(_at_)mnot(_dot_)net
    * Replace the last sentence with:

When a request message contains both a message-body of non-zero length and a method that does not define any semantics for that request message-body, then an origin server SHOULD either ignore the message-body or respond with an appropriate error message (e.g., 413). A proxy or gateway, when presented the same request, SHOULD either forward the request inbound with the message-body or ignore the message-body when determining a response.

as per 
http://www.w3.org/mid/9C43F5AB-C3D7-4584-8F12-A9F459D3817F(_at_)gbiv(_dot_)com
--- snip --



However RFC 2616 is also not very explicit about request bodies in the
method specifications.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf