At 9:16 AM -0700 9/2/08, Bob Braden wrote:
An aside: The purpose of AUTH48 state is not (should not be) to resolve
even minor issues. Ideally, no issues should arise in AUTH48, but the
world is not a perfect place. But let's not get in the habit of sweeping
minor changes to the every end of the publication process. The revision
process is pretty cheap.
A big +1 to that. It is becoming increasingly common to hear
reviewers and ADs say "please fix that in AUTH48" instead of "please
turn in a new draft with these small number of changes". Because
tools.ietf.org makes reading Internet Draft diffs so easy, there is
really no good reason to not have the input to the RFC Editor be a
known-clean document.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf