On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:11:15 -0500
John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
though one might
reasonably require that any volunteer have a firm expectation of
being able to attend f2f Nomcom meetings, participate in f2f
interviews, etc. (i.e., attend several meetings in succession
even if their earlier participation was less dense).
I think this is a very important point.
In addition, since Nomcoms seem to mostly evaluate and then
return incumbents (whether that is good or bad is a separate
issue; it is an observable fact), a case can be made that
evaluations from within the Nomcom about how I* members deal
with participants who do not routinely attend meetings could
actually enhance the Nomcom's effectiveness.
At the time Scott put me on the IPng directorate, I'd never attended a
meeting...
Meanwhile, you might be interested in the draft paper at
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papes/codebooks.pdf -- even if it cites
a very different Unicode...
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf