Hi -
Thanks for the clarification. Does this mean that if a WG
really has no concern that the documents it's working on would be
spun off to another organization, then it doesn't need to
worry about tracking down "contributors"?
Randy
From: "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge(_dot_)Contreras(_at_)wilmerhale(_dot_)com>
To: <randy_presuhn(_at_)mindspring(_dot_)com>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"
Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"No, absolutely not. Use of pre-5378 materials in
the IETF standards process has never been an issue,
only use outside the IETF is problematic (ie, allowed under 5378 but not the
earlier rules).
----- Original Message -----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wed Jan 14 19:32:27 2009
Subject: RFC 5378 "contributions"
Hi -
I originally asked this question on the WG chairs' list, and
was asked to ask again here...
The discussion about RFC 5378 (what little I've been able to
understand of it, anyway) has focussed on I-Ds and RFCs.
However, the definition of "contribution" in that document
includes, among other things, mailing list discussions.
Does this mean that we need to get contributor permission
before using, for example, material from a pre-5378 RFC in
a mailing list discussion, or before including text from a
pre-5378 email posting in an internet draft?
This seems really silly, but that's what the discussion is
starting to sound like to me.
Randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf