On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:57:28AM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
And the question is: did all those people writing in read and understand
the draft and fully understand the issue? Or are they just
regurgitating a "do this" announcement. How do you weigh a bunch of
uninformed responses against a fewer number of informed ones.
Surely that's a decision that has to be made by the shepherd of the
document? I know that when I have to evaluate the consensus in a WG,
figuring out whether someone's objections are ill-informed is one of
my jobs. Sometimes that involves asking follow-up questions to the
person who posts. (Like, for instance, "Have you read this draft?")
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf