Powers Chuck-RXCP20 <Chuck(_dot_)Powers(_at_)motorola(_dot_)com> wrote:
If the technology in the document to be standardized is
unencumbered, then the fact that _some_ uses of that technology may
run into encumbered territory is irrelevant, except to those who
hate patents in general.
I think software patents are a bad idea, and would prefer that there
be none of them. I think software is like music, and patenting
software is like patenting chords or melodies. Patents are the wrong
legal tool for software, and they undermine the purpose of IPR (which
is to promote "progress" of the "useful arts").
Nevertheless, I see no reason to oppose standardizing a protocol that
is unencumbered by patents, simply because some uses of that protocol
(even if they may be common) are encumbered.
I think such opposition requires more than mere opposition to software
patents, or to patents in general. At the very least, it also requires
that one not think through the logical consequences of one's strategy.
In practice, however, I believe most of the people who sent us
drive-by mailings were simply misinformed or mistaken about the facts.
-- Cos
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf