On 2009-02-25 14:05, David Morris wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Cullen Jennings wrote:
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Morris wrote:
while providing the operational efficiency of collecting all
discussion in one place for actual analysis of last call
While there may be better ways of doing it, I'll note the IETF LC
subject line is constructed to make it possible to find the LC
comments. If you remove the draft name from subject line of any LC
replies, you substantially reduce the odds of them being found and
read by the IESG.
But by forcing that assumption, you preclude the possiblity of
sub-dividing the discussion into related topics.
No. Just retain the draft name as part of the subject header.
To discuss foobars:
Subject: Foobars [Re: draft-ietf-barfoo-stuff-73.txt]
Brian
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf