Re: WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

Hi,

On 2009-4-22, at 2:19, Christian Vogt wrote:
> It seems that folks are considering two related, yet still orthogonal
> topics for inclusion in the MIF charter:
>
> - Conflicts between configuration parameters.
>
> - Issues with address selection.
I agree that both of these are important and should be worked on (and  
with the rest of your email, basically).
The first one is what I thought MIF would be focusing on, as an INT WG  
is IMO the right venue for this.
The second one is also important, but much more tricky, because it  
ties in with transports and applications (as Keith and others have  
pointed out already). Topics that cross area boundaries are always a  
bit difficult to charter. I'm at this point not fully convinced that  
simply throwing this in with topic #1 into one WG is going to work.
Lars

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf