No, I am also interested in "multiple network connections per host", but
my main interesting topic is *simultaneous* if multiple networks (or
multiple interfaces) are available. Sorry for this confusion.
Giyeong
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com]
Sent: April 21, 2009 10:21 AM
To: Giyeong Son
Cc: Sam Hartman; Ted Hardie; Adrian Farrel; mif; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)
Giyeong Son wrote:
I think that there are many working groups, standard bodies and
technologies who focuses on multiple addresses per host. So, I'd also
like MIF to concentrate on simultaneous connections to multiple
networks (or simultaneous use of multiple connections with multiple
networks). I believe that most of cases for simultaneous connections
to multiple networks require multiple addresses. However, it does not
need to be the main focus, but MIF NEEDS it. So, I would like to say
that multiple addresses per host needs to be addressed for
simultaneous use of multiple connections. Therefore, I think working
on MIF problem should be more than just focusing on multiple
addresses.
I think it's interesting that you appear to consider "multiple addresses
per host" a narrower problem than "multiple network connections per
host", whereas I consider the latter to be a subset of the former.
I suppose that makes a good illustration of why I really want the WG to
explore this issue from multiple points-of-view.
Keith
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf