ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-dont-wait (Nominating Committee Process: Earlier Announcement of Open Positions and Solicitation of Volunteers) to BCP

2009-06-05 19:43:44
Pekka:

- 'Nominating Committee Process: Earlier Announcement of Open Positions
  and Solicitation of Volunteers'
  <draft-dawkins-nomcom-dont-wait-03.txt> as a BCP

I have two issues with this.

 1) This places a new responsibility at the feet of IETF secretariat.
    That's a new actor (not even a person but a role) in the process.
    This is not good.

    Better would be that the process allowed some already responsible
    party (be it ISOC president, former NomCom chair, IETF chair, IAB
    chair, or all of the above) the _option_ to allow IETF secretariat
    to perform this announcement. (More about the "option" issue
    below)

 2) As proposed, the IETF secretariat's role is exclusive.  In the
    future no one else would have the authority to publish the
    solicitation.  I don't think this is good.  The role should be
    optional, if _responsible_ party(ies) chooses to take that path,
    or at most inclusive of other parties' authority.

The IETF Executive Director, who is part of the Secretariat, already has a role in NomCom. The IETF Executive Director provides the requirements for the open positions.

Would you be more comfortable if the Executive Director were named as the responsible party?

Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf