On Jun 11, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Actually, that raises a very good point.
At present the list is neither secret, nor public. Any bad effect from
the list being public will occur, any bad effect from it being secret
can occur.
I think that that is a "deep truth," since
1,$s/bad/good/
is also true.
Regards
Marshall
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Bob Hinden<bob(_dot_)hinden(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Joe,
1) exposing the full list to the entire community invites lobbying
the
nomcom
This probably already happens to some extent, but do
we really want to encourage this?
It's not clear this will lead to more lobbying than we have now. I
think
lobbying happens a lot now and is driven by the candidate him/
herself, or
the many people who get the "secret" lists. I think it would be more
balanced if everyone knew.
I would add that the current system gives a greater ability to
comment on
candidates to the leadership (IAB/IESG/WG Chairs) because they get
the many
of the "secret" nomcom candidate lists. The nomcom might get broader
feedback if the lists are open.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
--
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf