Re: Let's move on - Let's DNSCurve Re: DNSSEC is NOT secure end to end

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> These are assertions, not facts.
The fact is that since 1987, DNS has been mostly secure.

> that is what it is designed to do and that is how I define the
> term 'security'.
You did not simply say "security" but said "cryptographic security".

                                                Masataka Ohta

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf