ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

2009-07-02 09:29:38
Doug Ewell wrote:
Douglas Otis <dotis at mail dash abuse dot org> wrote:

Word's closed code is continuously changing. Availability of this closed application depends upon OS compatibility and version regressions. Both are moving targets. In addition, Word formats permit inclusion of potentially destructive scripts within highly flexible and obfuscating structures...

I didn't hear anyone ask to make evil Word from evil Microsoft the standard format for I-Ds and RFCs. I did hear a suggestion to enhance xml2rfc so it can interpret the XML generated by evil Word. The resulting code generated by xml2rfc would presumably have all of the evilness purged.
...

Just because xml2rfc happens to use a base XML format doesn't mean it can be easily changed to use a different XML vocabulary.

A conversion tool (reading Word, generating xml2rfc XML source) would make more sense, IMHO. That being said, I looked at this several years ago, and the 2003 Word XML format was a pain to process, and also lacks much of the interesting stuff (such as blbliographical information).

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf