Re: Obnoxious license2009-08-14 00:08:32Andrew Sullivan wrote: Why not have these "stable" licences published in RFCs? Those are already an archival format, so the reference is then not ambiguous. The code could then just include a [RFCnnnn] reference, I guess? +1 d/-- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
|