I would consider that OBE. As I understand it, the trust procedures no
longer require those license statements in RFCs.
Yours,
Joel
Sean Turner wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Sean Turner wrote:
...
In the documents I've worked on, it seems that they just want to put
the statement in the section that collects all the ABNF, ASN.1, XML,
etc.
...
Who is "they", and how is that consistent with what Joel just told us?
This might be overtaken by events, but I believe the "they" was the IESG
because they added the following RFC editor notes to the ASN.1 modules
in the these two documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/3053/
http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=934&k2=6530&tid=1250356550
spt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf