On 26 Feb 2010, at 16:45, SM wrote:
At 20:11 25-02-10, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Discussion, please. See below for my take; the IETF is one host, MX is
really meaningless, and there are benefits to avoiding a ton of spambot
zombie spam.
While we are on this topic, which of the following methods would you
recommend for a point of contact:
1. mailto [1] [2] [7] [8] [10] [12] [13]
2. email address without mailto [9]
3. AT [3]
4. at [4] [11]
5. & [5]
6. email address as an image [6]
The only one I object to strongly is 6, and that's because I can't see it and
nor can anybody using a textmode browser. Other than that, it makes sense to
avoid spam by not doing 1 or 2, although I would sooner not hide from spammers
by breaking functionality, which 2-5 implies.
Cheers,
Sabahattin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf