+1
--On Saturday, February 27, 2010 08:49 -0500 "John R. Levine"
<johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> wrote:
there is an MX. Where did you get the idea that not having
an MX offers protection from spambots?
That's interesting, but not what I described.
Well, OK. Let me rephrase my question: why do you believe
that removing the IETF's MX record will
a) decrease the amount of spam it receives?
b) not damage its legitimate mail flow?
Based on my experience and that of other people, neither is
true.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf