Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII

And ASCII is more eco-friendly :-)


Simplified Chinese is even more eco-friendly ;-)


Some times, encoding your example takes few bytes, HI only two.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, (continued) Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Tim Bray Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Martin Rex Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Doug Ewell Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Huub van Helvoort Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Jorge Amodio <= RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Eric Gray Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Julian Reschke Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, ned+ietf Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII, Rich Kulawiec Periodic debates, Dave CROCKER Re: Periodic debates, Jorge Amodio Re: Periodic debates, Dave CROCKER Re: Periodic debates, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Periodic debates, Sean Turner