All human systems of sufficient size and significance need a means of
protection from "abuse of process". This IETF process uses email and
thus needs protection from the abuse thereof.
In my opinion, the IETF method of deciding to bar people from various
mailing lists is fine and the IETF is pretty liberal in this regard,
allowing people to continue to post who would be barred in other
groups.
Thanks,
Donald
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen
<arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no> wrote:
On 05/05/2010 03:48 PM, todd glassey wrote:
What that means is like auditors NO email may be excluded from the
history of the vetting process lest the practice be subjected to random
and uncontrolled censorship.
You seem to be saying that pests cannot be kicked off WG/IETF lists... or do
I misunderstand?
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf