Russ,
Thank you/the secretariat for chasing this level of detail down. I suspected
the numbers would look something like this, and didn't want to ask for it,
but it's much appreciated that you guys did check.
With the addition of this information to the previous debate I am
supportive of the IESG's message dated 14 May as a stopgap measure, and
applaud the IESG for arriving at what is (IMO at least) a fair
compromise position that takes into account the concerns expressed by
the community.
What Doug said.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf