Enrico,
Nobody has suggested there was anything wrong with the old (NUL)
access method nor that any damage has ever been caused, but that
is entirely orthogonal to the matter at hand. We are (in November)
going to a location where such access is "required" (at least it
seems a good idea from host's point of view), so we are testing
it in another location, Maastricht, first to iron out bugs etc.
Ole
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Marocco Enrico wrote:
+1
Also, if we really need to switch to a new access method, I would
deeply appreciate if someone explained what was wrong with the old
one, i.e. what damage was ever caused by an open IETF network. If any.
--
Ciao,
Enrico
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf