ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

2010-07-04 06:27:29
That is understood, Andrew's comment I seconded was about the
possibility of the change becoming permanent after Beijing.

--
Ciao,
Enrico

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 3, 2010, at 21:19, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:


Enrico,

Nobody has suggested there was anything wrong with the old (NUL)
access method nor that any damage has ever been caused, but that
is entirely orthogonal to the matter at hand. We are (in November)
going to a location where such access is "required" (at least it
seems a good idea from host's point of view), so we are testing
it in another location, Maastricht, first to iron out bugs etc.

Ole


On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Marocco Enrico wrote:
+1

Also, if we really need to switch to a new access method, I would
deeply appreciate if someone explained what was wrong with the old
one, i.e. what damage was ever caused by an open IETF network. If
any.

--
Ciao,
Enrico



Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone 
indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla 
conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate 
ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne 
immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, 
Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged 
information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, 
printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender 
by return e-mail, Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>