That is understood, Andrew's comment I seconded was about the
possibility of the change becoming permanent after Beijing.
--
Ciao,
Enrico
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2010, at 21:19, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Enrico,
Nobody has suggested there was anything wrong with the old (NUL)
access method nor that any damage has ever been caused, but that
is entirely orthogonal to the matter at hand. We are (in November)
going to a location where such access is "required" (at least it
seems a good idea from host's point of view), so we are testing
it in another location, Maastricht, first to iron out bugs etc.
Ole
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Marocco Enrico wrote:
+1
Also, if we really need to switch to a new access method, I would
deeply appreciate if someone explained what was wrong with the old
one, i.e. what damage was ever caused by an open IETF network. If
any.
--
Ciao,
Enrico
Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone
indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla
conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate
ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne
immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione,
Grazie.
This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged
information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying,
printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender
by return e-mail, Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf