Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-daboo-srv-caldav-05

On 19 jul 2010, at 16.07, Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> > Let me state that I do not think we should delay the
> > draft-daboo-srv-caldav IF a work like this is started. If we get some
> > work like this, I suggest letting draft-daboo-srv-caldav pass, given
> > people do not think the solution with an http redirect is too weird.
> So Alexey did ask the authors of .well-known about this use and we have a 
> little side-thread going on that. I am certainly willingly to be persuaded 
> that draft-daboo-srv-caldav is stretching the use too far, in which case I 
> would suggest a "TXT path='/xyz'" solution.
>
> So one question I have with URI is whether additional "metadata" is likely to 
> be needed? In which case TXT is likely to be used at provide that. If that is 
> the case, then I don't see why URI is needed, vs SRV/TXT (with a path= in the 
> TXT).
Use of TXT RR? Arghhhh... Not better.

Why, why, why?

> > I do not like the mechanism proposed in draft-daboo-srv-caldav.
> > Definitely not. But that is a different thing than requiring rough
> > consensus on a generic way of finding an endpoint of a connection for a
> > service.
> >
> > Luckily, Maastricht is a week from now and we can talk about it.
> I'm up for that.
Excellent. Interested parties should try to meet.

   Patrik

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf