On Aug 9, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Martin Rex wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
as much as 10% of of the partficipants might be remote, generally less,
almost never more.
There is a difference in the effectiveness of remote vs. on-premise
participation.
I don't think anyone disputes this (or even intended on raising it as an
issue). My understanding of the blue sheets were that they were deemed useful
as they provide an indication of attendance at working group meetings for
various (e.g., room sizing, legal, etc.) purposes. With increased remote
participation (even if it isn't as good as on-premises), I'd assume including
remote participants in the attendees list would be valuable/appropriate. While
Jabber logs probably contain this information, centralized/standardized
participation lists might be an additional justification to try online
attendance tools.
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf