It's certainly true that you need to use security products that
support IPv6 as well as they support IPv4. If they don't, change
vendors. Apart from that, it's scare-mongering. Consider that
the basic model for IPv6 is not fundamentally different than IPv4;
why would the underlying security vulnerabilities be fundamentally
different?
I happen to be aware that a serious independent analysis of IPv6 security
is being carried out, and hopefully will appear in the not too distant
future. It will not be scare-mongering, judging by the draft I've seen.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2010-08-27 08:51, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc wrote:
IPv6 in the press
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/06/ipv6_security_nightmare/
Portzamparc
Internet User
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf