* Brian E. Carpenter:
the basic model for IPv6 is not fundamentally different than IPv4;
why would the underlying security vulnerabilities be fundamentally
different?
Lack of NAT and an expectation of end-to-end reachability seem quite
fundamentally different from IPv4 as it is deployed to day. (I'm not
saying that NAT is a security feature, I'm just pointing to a rather
significant difference.)
IPv6 also make IPsec mandatory, which seems a significant change over
IPv4, too.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf