ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is this true?

2010-08-26 18:24:54
On 2010-08-27 11:10, Dave CROCKER wrote:


On 8/26/2010 2:27 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
  Apart from that, it's scare-mongering. Consider that
the basic model for IPv6 is not fundamentally different than IPv4;
why would the underlying security vulnerabilities be fundamentally
different?


well, just to give that question its due, interesting changes in details
can sometimes produce interesting changes in the behavior of a model and
therefore of its implications.

in this case, the vastly larger address space of IPv6 permits attackers
to switch to new addresses at a rate that was not possible with IPv4. 
this is likely to defeat the substantial infrastructure of
attack-tracking that is address-based, such as for anti-spam.

True, but the same property means that scanning attacks are infeasible
against IPv6 subnets. Attack tracking based on subnets may work
fine, though. Swings and roundabouts.

Anyway - nobody is saying that there are no security issues with IPv6.

    Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>