ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

2010-09-13 13:54:16

=>  I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this
problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC
says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how
else you can solve it _here_.

I am open to solve it here and I have suggestion :

- make DHCPv6-PD-NEMO assign a default route to the Mobile Router at
   home.

What do you think?

=> That can work but I don't understand why you don't like the host on
egress interface behaviour. The RFC seems inconsistent on its requirements
for the egress interface at home, but it's been a long time since I read it
so I may have forgotten some of the reasons. I think it can work and at
least it will lead to a consistent implementation.
Extending DHCP can work but whether it's done here or in dhc or mif is not
really important to me.

Hesham


I also followed advice and went asking to DHC WG.  I got redirected to
MIF soon-Charter DHCP options route table, and got mentioned
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router req W-3 talking DHCPv6-PD and default
route.

Alex



Hesham








_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>