I am not sure why this rush to get a new internet draft out, without
consultation to any of its original authors, and given the rough consensus on
ietf mailing list discussion is to keep NETBLT RFC as is (experimental).
Lixia
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Internet-Drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Network Block Transfer Protocol (NETBLT)
Author(s) : J. White, M. Yevstifeyev
Filename : draft-white-tsvwg-netblt-00.txt
Pages : 34
Date : 2011-01-08
This document is a specification of version 5 of Network Block
Transfer Protocol (NETBLT). This protocol was firstly specified in
RFC 969, that has been made obsolete by RFC 998. Nevertheless, none
of these documents match current Internet Standards and are
deprecated. This document aligns the NETBLT specification with the
most current Internet Standards and obsoletes RFC 998.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-tsvwg-netblt-00.txt
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
<Mail Attachment>_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf