Parts of the challenge here is that turning on IPv6 (publishing a AAAA) can
also cause brokenness for users that have no IPv6 connectivity, e.g., those
relying on broken 6to4 relays. This has been documented all over the place,
for example here:
<http://ripe61.ripe.net/presentations/162-ripe61.pdf>
So even if there are very few IPv6 eyeballs, this event can serve to flush out
that flavor of brokenness. As I understand it, part of the idea of everyone
moving together is to get people to see the brokenness across multiple sites,
thus to blame the network not the content provider, thus to pressure the
networks to fix things.
--Richard
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
On 2011-2-15, at 19:45, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Noting the increasing length of the list
athttp://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/participants/
...I mostly note that I see very few eyeball ISPs on that list (with the
notable exception of two large US cable ISPs - great, guys!)
Turning on IPv6 on the content provider side is great and all, but without
the eyeballs on IPv6, I wonder a bit about the point of this exercise.
Lars_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf