Got it in 1.
On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 3/29/2011 1:31 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Correct.
The interoperability need shifts away from the client-to-server side (for
example, to the server-to-server side;
No, that's wrong and I believe it is not what Eric said at all.
THERE IS STILL A CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL, HANNES.
ALL THAT CHANGES IS THAT THE CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL IS NOW PROPRIETARY.
I apologize for shouting. I'm shouting for the classic reason that I'm
taking your continuing to misunderstand this multiply-repeated and very basic
point as a hearing problem.
Server-server is an entirely different task and different part of the
architecture.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf